Alex Rybakov vs Ezekiel Clark Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing their recent form on second serve performance, Rybakov exhibits a superior statistic, winning 47.28% of points compared to Clark's 38.28%. This metric is often a reliable indicator for predicting match outcomes. Additionally, when returning the opponent's second serve, Clark leads with a 48.91% win rate, whereas Rybakov has a slightly lower success rate at 45.77%. Comparing these figures for first serve returns, Clark once again surpasses Rybakov, claiming 30.95% of points versus 26.61%. Such return statistics can be pivotal in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchups.

Both players demonstrate distinct strengths concerning surfaces, with Rybakov achieving his best win percentage of 62% on indoor hard courts. Clark shows his prowess on hard surfaces, securing wins in 57% of his matches. However, Clark struggles with a win percentage of 42% on indoor hard surfaces, while Rybakov's weakness appears on grass with a 50% win rate. These surface preferences can heavily influence performance predictions within specific tournaments.

Examining their ability under pressure, Rybakov edges out Clark by saving 54.07% of breakpoints compared to Clark's 45.5%, a crucial factor when forecasting match dynamics and potential swings in momentum. However, in terms of converting breakpoint opportunities, Clark has the upper hand recently, achieving a 35.95% conversion rate over Rybakov’s 30.16%, making live betting strategies particularly interesting during these pressure points.

The performance overview for the past year shows Rybakov has had a higher match win rate of 60.87%, dominating Clark's 49.02%. In a direct head-to-head comparison, Rybakov holds a perfect record with a victory at their only encounter at the Champaign Challenger. Rybakov convincingly won 6-3, 6-2 on an indoor hard court, which could potentially predict his dominance in upcoming matches on similar surfaces.

While Clark tends to face tougher opponents with an average rank of 75.22 compared to Rybakov's 396.52, this experience might not be enough to tip the scales. When the clash goes into a deciding set, Rybakov excels with a 56% win rate over the last year, compared to Clark’s modest 28%. This statistic could be crucial if the match extends to longer lengths.

Considering their head-to-head history along with these detailed statistics, Rybakov appears favored to triumph in their upcoming match. His overall higher match-winning percentage, success on preferred indoor hard court surfaces, and superior performance in deciding sets outline a strong probability of him securing another victory.